(December 23, 2015 at 12:58 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Chad, the problem with Plantinga's ontology is that it tries to use a non-sequitor mathematical principle of probability.If, as you say, he is using it mathematically then I suppose you are right. Maybe there is a distinction being made of which I am ignorant. To me at least, Plantinga seems to be using 'probable' in a way similar to previous uses of the word 'possible'. I must admit that my focus on Scholastic nomenclature sometimes gets in the way of understand modern uses of the same or similar terms.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 8, 2025, 12:14 am
Thread Rating:
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 42 Guest(s)