When Atheists Can't Think Episode 1: No Evidence for God?

[drfuzzy]

EVIDENCE.  You yammer on and on and on about "evidence", you ignore responses and keep yammering about "evidence", and even when we ask for "evidence" you keep yammering on and give us nothing.  Zip.  Nada.   Pages upon pages upon pages of people asking for your "evidence".  You give us absolutely nothing.  Worse than nothing - you ignore everything you've been told, and type crap like the nonsense above.  All you do is stick your nose in the air, try to think up a new way to tell us how superior you are, and have fun typing more insults.  

We tell you and tell you and tell you:  Definition of atheism =  disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.    We tell you that we have not seen sufficient substantive empirical evidence to support belief in any deities.   Evidence, not something from a book of fairy tales, not stories for people who had "experiences", not philosophical arguments, not "look around you, only an idiot looks at nature and fails to see god" - - - you keep flapping your jaw about evidence, so give us the evidence.  

Put up or shut up.  How much longer are you going to spread shit all over our carpets and try to claim you're throwing pearls before swine?

I have to ask you to stop and think more carefully.

Read the question:

People can see no evidence of God because they have competently examined the evidence and found it lacking, or they are simply incompetent and incapable of seeing the evidence. Which are you?

"Where is the evidence?" is not one of the answers. The answers are one of the following:
a) I've examined the evidence and found it lacking, or
b) I'm incompetent and incapable of seeing the evidence.

I don't have to answer your insulting 2-option proposition, because they are essentially flawed to begin with.  They are a word-salad way of saying "evidence exists but you're either too stupid or too incompetent to recognize it", therefore, either way, I win.  What a crock.  And you really apparently think that's acceptable debate technique.

Evidence.  Not arguments.  Not word-salad.  Not quotes from books or philosophical musings.  The only "evidence" that will EVER convince me of the existence of something like a deity (or whatever most humans think a deity is . . . ) is scientific proof.   Concrete, measurable, have the creature show up to be measured and videotaped proof.  When that happens, I will change my stance.  If you know that this has already happened, show us, and we'll thank you.  If not,  .