(December 24, 2015 at 10:33 pm)paulpablo Wrote:(December 24, 2015 at 2:43 pm)Delicate Wrote: Atheists say things. Deepak Chopra says things. Politicians say things. Lawyers say things. Salesmen say things.
Who is to believe without evidence?
I've presented a fault with your reasoning and you haven't presented any sort of argument back. Are you going to conclude our conversation with seemingly meaningless words or do you want to stay on track with the topic which is your opinion that atheism is a belief despite that not being the definition of atheism?
You say atheism = a belief.
Actual definition of atheism = lack of belief in gods or god.
Your reply to this is that people say things.
Can you see how this doesn't seem to be a valid reply or deal with any of the points raised so far?
You haven't presented a fault. You've alleged a definition that makes no sense.
I reject it, and I've given reasons for doing so.
If my reasons don't cut mustard, please explain how. But don't keep repeating the baseless assertion any the definition of atheism.