RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
January 7, 2016 at 7:37 pm
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2016 at 7:52 pm by popsthebuilder.)
(January 7, 2016 at 6:52 pm)Rhythm Wrote: If you stub your toe, regardless of whether or not you decide to believe that you stubbed your toe.....you could just show us a stubbed toe. God vanishes the moment someone assesses god claims critically. No stubbed gods to show for all your trouble, huh? Special exemptions for special gods. Do you understand why this response fails to be rationally tenable? You're asking us to suspend the rules in this case, you're asking us to ignore the dissimilarity in your own chosen analogy.Not asking you to suspend anything. If I stubbed my toe five years ago and showed it to you today would it be evident that I hurt it unless it was severely damaged?
What do you have to suspend in order to believe in a creative force? Is the big bang a creative force? Is the sun? What about carbon? I state that God doesn't refute science and science doesn't refute GOD. You say that God isn't needed to explain existence. I remind you that our observations and the theories based on them are neither complete or factual, just hypotheses.
Indeed God is the unifying point of all existence and all encompassing, something no scientific theory can say.
Why do atheist always act like science refutes the existence of a single causal force responsible, in one way or another, for all other existence, laws, and energy?
Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
