(January 9, 2016 at 1:53 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(January 9, 2016 at 1:20 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: That was her objection though, to her it is relevant, she is saying I'm taking for granted God exists for the argument to work. So I'm trying to get her past that. So that we can discuss other parts of the argument.
No mystic,
What I cannot get past is this absurd notion that morality cannot exist with out a god. The fact that your whole "argument," which is set up to "prove" this idea, falls completely out of the realm of common sense only compounds the issue.
Ok which premise do you have an issue with now? Attacking the conclusion without the argument doesn't make sense. So tell me which premise do you have an issue with.
