We live in an existence without a God. Adding a God to our existence would change the nature of our existence in a way that is unknowable.
So the question is "How would you behave in a reality that is unfathomable?" I can barely guess how I'd behave in plenty of fathomable situations in an existence I understand.
We try to have it both ways a lot with the Theists.
1) We point out that they are claiming to have all this factual information about the nature of God, despite it being outside of space/time/comprehension/etc...basically, unknowable to the human mind.
2) We then confine that God to the rules of our Godless existence, and point out contradictions.
If we claim to know our reaction to the existence of God, we are disagreeing with 1, which I think is adopting one of the biggest flaws in the theists thinking.
So the question is "How would you behave in a reality that is unfathomable?" I can barely guess how I'd behave in plenty of fathomable situations in an existence I understand.
We try to have it both ways a lot with the Theists.
1) We point out that they are claiming to have all this factual information about the nature of God, despite it being outside of space/time/comprehension/etc...basically, unknowable to the human mind.
2) We then confine that God to the rules of our Godless existence, and point out contradictions.
If we claim to know our reaction to the existence of God, we are disagreeing with 1, which I think is adopting one of the biggest flaws in the theists thinking.
