(January 30, 2016 at 6:09 pm)Rhythm Wrote: -and the specifics of what you've called a "solid argument" would answer -every single question- you asked.
You can understand my confusion at seeing the two trains of thought alongside each other as though they were complementary? You are essentially asking for your own religion's history, which they were kind enough to keep records of, as though it didn't exist...when you clearly think that it does. What gives?
What I'm asking is this: If the gospels were circulated anonymously for many years before being attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, were are the copies of the manuscripts which do not have their names associated with them?
And how did the Church manage to label each and every single copy of these anonymous gospels without any record of this project being mentioned in the writings of the Early Church Fathers?
So, dear atheist, if you want to claim that we don't know who wrote the gospels, where is YOUR evidence of anonymity?
