RE: "I disagree with you, but i don't think you're Hitler"
February 22, 2011 at 11:45 am
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2011 at 11:49 am by Rwandrall.)
(February 22, 2011 at 11:39 am)leo-rcc Wrote: Probably neither, since I've heard it all. If rational discourse is what you are after, than that is your perogative, but you do not get to dictate how others deal wih their atheism.
My point is if both parties think the other is an blinded dangerous idiot, no dialogue is possible. And a discussion without dialogue and exchange of ideas is entirely useless. Why would you argue with a theist if neither of you is going to listen to what the other has to say anyways ?
And nowhere did i "dictate" anything to anyone. I am allowed to /facepalm when i see an atheist saying believing in God means being an enemy of Science without having to impose my views on them, just like i am allowed to /facepalm when i see a theist saying atheists are immoral.