Some of the arguments in the 2004 case were funny in the extreme. IIRC, one of the attorneys insinuated it would entirely possible for everyone in the building to have been guilty of something unsavory and the court should certainly weigh that consideration.
As I recall, the decision was 9-0 in 2004. Infer what you want about the existence of frisky jurists . . .
As I recall, the decision was 9-0 in 2004. Infer what you want about the existence of frisky jurists . . .
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
