(February 4, 2016 at 11:28 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote:(December 12, 2015 at 1:37 pm)athrock Wrote: I have never seen this argument before, so I'm interested in some discussion of it. A philosopher by the name of Alvin Plantinga states it this way:
The Ontological Argument
- It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
- If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists is some possible world.
- If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.
- If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.
- If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists.
- Therefore, a maximally great being exists.
Thoughts?
Every time I see a christer bring up an argument "proving" his particular gawd that starts with "It is possible..." I think of this:
Christer: It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
Me: Well, I guess, maybe. But, it's an insanly small chance.
Christer:
LMFAO! One of my, and the hubby's favorite movies of all TIME.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.