Gay, Catholic and Doing Fine

[Esquilax]

As you know, I've spent a LOT of time responding to your posts. (You're the 25-year-old with the bachelor's degree in philosophy who works full time as a social worker who thinks he can take down William Lane Craig who has TWO PhD's in philosophy and spends all HIS time studying the philosophical arguments for God and other apologetics subjects.)

I remember. You spent the majority of that thread mistaking mockery for rebuttal, just as here you're mistaking dismissal for rebuttal. I have a pretty strong suspicion you don't actually know what a cogent response even is.

However, maybe I'm wrong.

I will watch your posts for some evidence that you know Jesus and Catholicism well (or at all).

Again, you're not making your case. You're not making any case. When somebody makes an argument and you flit down from your pedestal to just say "you don't know my religion," before flitting away again, you aren't saying anything substantive at all. It's little more than just braying "nuh-uh!"

If I'm wrong about something then I'm wrong, and I'm happy to have a discussion about why that might be and why an opposing view to mine might be right, and how we can tell the difference, but that conversation would actually need to happen. I can't be corrected if the most effort you're willing to expend is just fiat dismissal based in a vague and unsubstantiated denial of my points. You aren't arguing effectively. I can't even fathom what you think you're accomplishing with this, but you aren't actually quelling any of the contentions that I have.

You could do that with reason and evidence, but as it stands, what I've said remains unchallenged.