What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[robvalue]

This thread is about "worst arguments for theism", and trying to trash evolution based on incredulity and ignorance is not only a bad argument but it's not even an argument for theism.

An intelligence does not equal a god, whatever the fuck a god is anyway. A god does not equal Yahweh, which is what you believe before even beginning with any science. And Yawheh does not equal the particular version of Yahweh that lives in your head, after you've filtered out all the bits of the bible you don't like.

You didn't reach the conclusion that Christianity is true through science; you're just trying to poison what you see as the alternative, to try and convince yourself your pre-drawn conclusion is somehow rational. But anyone who knows the first thing about science does not employ the argument from ignorance, neither do they employ "done by magic" as a hypothesis.

Science is about modelling and testing. What model, and what tests to back up that model, does anyone who believes in ID ever propose?

Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Unfalsifiable claims are useless.