RE: Who will be the running mates?
February 22, 2016 at 6:00 pm
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2016 at 6:00 pm by Heat.)
(February 22, 2016 at 5:52 pm)Minimalist Wrote:"Even though Sanders would clearly win in the general election let's just assume that because of something I do not know, and that reasons I cannot describe would change results by an amount that I am entirely guessing, and Sanders would still lose because ___"Quote:Bernie Sanders is beating every Republican by numbers that could run against him in the general election.
Oh, stop it. They haven't even started working Sanders over yet because they don't consider him the likely nominee. If he ever did get the nomination you'd hear the word SOCIALIST repeated so often your ears would bleed and with the morons who make up the 'murrican electorate it would work.
And again, that has nothing to do with subtracting two democratic votes in the senate.
That's basically what you're saying.
It's like "Oh he's winning? He'll still lose. Why? Fuck if I know, he just will."
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
