RE: Interesting debate over there .....
February 25, 2016 at 1:07 pm
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2016 at 1:08 pm by Ben Davis.)
(February 25, 2016 at 12:33 pm)pool the great Wrote:
Also, you're ignoring the institutional sexism that results from male privilege: women are (on average and when compared to men in the same job/role, with only a couple of exceptions) paid less, less likely to be hired in to secure roles, less likely to be promoted and less likely to be able to rise to as high a rank as their male counterparts. Given that disparity, it's acceptable to me, overall, that there might be an generalised expectation that men would pay more of the upkeep however I would expect a case-by-case assessment of earnings and for maintenance payments to be set fairly, according to circumstances.
Sum ergo sum