I agree with most of the video except that I don't think it can be put simply to be command of God, and that morality is a divine code of commands.
This would make morality arbitrary. We would not know if it's good to obey the Creator or not. We cannot simply believe it's good to obey the Creator because they Creator says so or threatens us with punishment or promises reward or programs us to believe so.
Just like we cannot simply believe something is good because evolution programmed us to believe it's good.
Rather believing in the command of God in the soul is about believing the nature of God himself, the nature of light, the nature of existence, it's to believe in the divine link. The command is revelation of God in saying to the human, you are light in so much as you are related to the source, and honor way to ascend to him is through the good word in the soul which the the righteous lifts towards God.
The other issue is everything is judged and every action is measured by relative to the knowledge and state of that being.
That is why relative morality and objective morality are not opposites, but work together. The relative morality get's it realism in it's relationship or reality compared to the objective standard.
As well, if we are ever going to transcend our errors and subjectivity, we need access to one who has attained certainty in vision of God's Signs, Glories, commands, and revelations, and that person must show us the way.
Aside from this, is the issue of how rights are created. Rights and value of people are created through a reality that is real. It's not simply conceptual.
One problem with Atheism is that it tends to make morality to be some sort of conceptual program, while, in in theism, it recognizes that it's a living reality. That said, Atheists can't even see themselves as living realities as opposed to a program created by the brain. Even their will power has no reality as opposed to simply an experienced created by the brain.
They deny will power living reality, goodness living reality, the inheritance of actions to the soul, etc.
Yet if they would just observe themselves, think about what an action is, their value, and inheritance of value, they would see a divine link.
If they would ponder over the issue of higher to lower reality, that's not simply metaphorically higher, but there is spiritual ranks, then everything becomes easy.
I think I've made over 10 topics that all are about this issue but from different angles, and different forms of argument.
This would make morality arbitrary. We would not know if it's good to obey the Creator or not. We cannot simply believe it's good to obey the Creator because they Creator says so or threatens us with punishment or promises reward or programs us to believe so.
Just like we cannot simply believe something is good because evolution programmed us to believe it's good.
Rather believing in the command of God in the soul is about believing the nature of God himself, the nature of light, the nature of existence, it's to believe in the divine link. The command is revelation of God in saying to the human, you are light in so much as you are related to the source, and honor way to ascend to him is through the good word in the soul which the the righteous lifts towards God.
The other issue is everything is judged and every action is measured by relative to the knowledge and state of that being.
That is why relative morality and objective morality are not opposites, but work together. The relative morality get's it realism in it's relationship or reality compared to the objective standard.
As well, if we are ever going to transcend our errors and subjectivity, we need access to one who has attained certainty in vision of God's Signs, Glories, commands, and revelations, and that person must show us the way.
Aside from this, is the issue of how rights are created. Rights and value of people are created through a reality that is real. It's not simply conceptual.
One problem with Atheism is that it tends to make morality to be some sort of conceptual program, while, in in theism, it recognizes that it's a living reality. That said, Atheists can't even see themselves as living realities as opposed to a program created by the brain. Even their will power has no reality as opposed to simply an experienced created by the brain.
They deny will power living reality, goodness living reality, the inheritance of actions to the soul, etc.
Yet if they would just observe themselves, think about what an action is, their value, and inheritance of value, they would see a divine link.
If they would ponder over the issue of higher to lower reality, that's not simply metaphorically higher, but there is spiritual ranks, then everything becomes easy.
I think I've made over 10 topics that all are about this issue but from different angles, and different forms of argument.