Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 14, 2025, 11:10 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The stupid "Apex" "design" argument.....
#23
RE: The stupid "Apex" "design" argument.....
(March 4, 2016 at 8:40 am)Rhythm Wrote: I;m not promoting anything, lol.  I'm correcting you on a point of fact.  I supected that you -actually- meant to rail against something else and simply didn;t understand what you were talking about from the moment you made the OP.  That we are an apex species, and that we are capable of greater resilience than anything that came before us, that we can survive what your little water bears cannot and could not, is a demonstrable fact (and you speak as if our own ancestors hadn't survived everything the water bear has in the first place, fucking ridiculous).  That doesn't justify every stupid decision we make or bad idea we have- and I've seen no one make that claim. 

The only "stupid apex argument" I've seen in this thread is your own.

UGGGGGGGGG, AND ARRGGGGE AND NEENER NEENER!

DUDE no and sorry. "Apex" does NOT mean shit. It only means something in terms of our ability to extend our FINITE ride. Outside that we dont mean shit to evolution or our 4 billion year old planet, or our 14 billion year old universe.

Being on top only means we are smarter than others species, that's it, but we are also at the same time an invasive species and exploit to the point of hurting the home we live on. UNLESS you accept that being on "top" does not mean shit. And right now outside of the experts most humans are stuck still in local tribal ignorance. 

"Apex" has to be put in terms of pragmatism, not just "we have bigger brains". AND RIGHT NOW we don't have enough pragmatic humans focusing on the right things. 

And again, any evolutionary biologist can tell you with other life in an ecosystem, that "apex" species can dominate but also to the point of self destruction. That is why "apex" isn't as much as important word to focus on as much as "pragmatism". 

"Im smart" is also the argument apologists use to spread religion, and that to can be an "apex" in a society. "On top" doesn't mean good or always right.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... - by Brian37 - March 2, 2016 at 1:54 pm
RE: The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... - by Brian37 - March 3, 2016 at 12:44 pm
RE: The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... - by Brian37 - March 4, 2016 at 10:07 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Stupid things religious people say Silver 2275 283380 3 hours ago
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 9481 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Stupid christans look to ban Good Omens Pat Mustard 64 11369 July 11, 2019 at 3:30 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Just how stupid were the ancient Israelites? The Valkyrie 115 25194 June 1, 2018 at 5:39 am
Last Post: Joods
  Intelligent Design (brief overview). Mystic 70 18090 May 9, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Stupid theist tricks........ Brian37 6 2961 April 29, 2018 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Stupid Christians NuclearEnergy 103 28763 August 22, 2017 at 11:09 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 5205 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 58384 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Stupid arguments for God The Atheist 16 4869 March 25, 2016 at 10:46 pm
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)