RE: My views on objective morality
March 9, 2016 at 8:35 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 8:36 am by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(March 9, 2016 at 12:52 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Well, catching up on all the comments, looks like I'm still being accused of "excusing the complicity of rape", or whatever the new way of wording it is. So I'm going to leave this thread. Feeling extremely sour about the whole forum in general right now and the people in it. I only hold people to the same standards as myself, and I would NEVER mind fuck anyone the way I'm being mind fucked here in regards to my position on rape. There are a lot of things I would never do/say to another person that get said to me quite often here, and I brush it off and make excuses for people all the time, but this in particular crosses a line for me. Thank you to the several people who defended me. To everyone else here who is continuing to tell me I think rape is anything other than what I actually said it is (objectively immoral, inherently evil) frankly, I don't want to have anything to do with you.
I'm very sorry you feel that way, CL, but as I see it you have been mind-fucked since you were a little child with ideas which you would surely have rejected, for very good reasons and most probably correctly had you first heard them as an adult! So was I, btw, and finding my freedom from those oppressive ideas was a painful process, but still well worth it.
When an idea doesn't make good sense, and fails the logic litmus test for good sense, then it not only doesn't make good sense in reality, but it can lead to unintended evil. I speak only for myself, but I believe this is what we've all been trying to point out to you. There's simply no good sense in looking to the god which you believe in as a moral standard, and if you do then you endorse what he does / allows from the position of "the all-powerful and omnipresent".
Mr. Hanky loves you!