(March 9, 2016 at 2:20 am)kimsland Wrote: The question is biased and unrelated to Christianity vs. 'anti's'
It is an argument putting yourself in the Christians foolish feelings of eternity.
I could just as easily state, hey religos, how do you feel about science finally discovering the answer to origins, would you like it? How can they answer yes or no!
If you wish to ask a fanciful question about Tinkerbell fairy dust giving you wings to fly around the rose garden as a tiny insect forever, I suspect you should first ask who in the hell would believe this crap (pretty sure the No's have it).
I cannot argue FOR the Christianity mythology. But if science is able to upload our internal minds to a supercomputer one day, I suppose yeah that would be good. But your ridiculous similarity idea with religion (as stated: Q for anti's) the BEST answer would be > That's ridiculous religious nonsense.
MY dreamlike state of ever lasting life would be FAR different to ANY religious misguided concept based on feelings!
I don't know where you got all that gibberish in my short question. If anyone is bias, it would be you. "anti" is a short for anti-theist. I've been around here long enough for people to point out their levels of non-belief might not mean complete atheism. Also, it would be fruitless asking a "pro-theist" if they want eternal life.
You can speculate my penchant for the afterlife.... but don't assume you are right.
My question was out of curiosity. And I appreciate the honest answers from most of you. I have some interesting thoughts provoked by the intriguing answers! I will comment later. thx R
Quis ut Deus?
