(March 9, 2016 at 11:36 am)Whateverist the White Wrote:(March 9, 2016 at 6:43 am)bennyboy Wrote: awwwww.
1) Makes a thread about objective morality in a philosophy thread.
2) Claims some things, like rape, are objectively evil.
3) People point out that God allows rape.
4) Claims she was attacked totally unprovoked, despite having done no actual philosophy, and providing no counter to any of the attempts at logic done by anybody participating.
CL, I've said this before: your chosen religious institution's ideas are not compatible with your own feelings about how life should work. Ditch the baggage, or live in a state of illogic. That's up to you. But you don't get to start this kind of thread, in this kind of forum, and get upset when people use examples of immorality to show why your ideas aren't coherent.
Lets examen your response:
1) Reads an avowed Catholic claim that rape is objectively evil in a philosophy thread.
2) Points out that God allows rape.
3) Assumes that it is illogical for God to allow what is objectively immoral.
4) Assumes that everyone who believes in said God must be a big time fan of rape, objective evilness and all.
5) Calls the Catholic an enabler and engages in a mob mind fuck of the Catholic.
Quote:CL, I've said this before: your chosen religious institution's ideas are not compatible with your own feelings about how life should work.
Yeah come on Cathy, as ultra logical atheists you should just take our word on this. Who really is in a better position to know what you feel and what that means than us?
::bold mine:: Are you saying special pleading is not illogical? Not being wise, I am trying to understand here.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.