My views on objective morality

[Mister Agenda]

That's a question I can't answer for you. You've gone way beyond anything I would do in an argument, and I don't understand it at all. And I don't consider myself particularly kind online. Sometimes the things I say are an abuse of sarcasm.

Perhaps I should pursue this until I get you to admit I'm right or give up on interacting with me?

If you read my posts I actually did the exact opposite of giving up interacting with her.  I extended an unconditional invitation for further discussion, in fact.  Yes, a few of my posts were short and temperamental, but I slept on it and I like to think, did a better job of explaining myself this morning.  No one is infallible.  Least of all me.

Seeing as that's kind of the opposite of what I was getting at: you kept at her until she gave up on interacting with you, maybe you shouldn't be so confident in your ability to interpret what other people believe based on what they say. My proposal was that I hound you about this until you give up on interacting with me. I was in no way accusing you of giving up on interacting with CL.

And assuming that I would not have the position I have unless I had not read the thread speaks to your style of assigning failures on the part of your interlocuters as the most likely explanation for them not sharing your point of view.

I'm sure there are lots of people more fallible than you, I may be among them. It's not like I looked at your posts to CL and thought   'there goes Lady of Camus again, harassing people'. I wouldn't take the time for someone who hadn't given me reason to expect better.