There's an angle we haven't talked about yet. If there is NO God, then what is the real difference between "subjective" and "objective"? Wouldn't "subjective" morality be a product of determinist chemistry, brain function, DNA, environment, etc. anyway? In other words, wouldn't the "subjective" sense of it be simply the experience of it, and the "objective" sense of it be the actual mechanism of moral thought and behavior?
It seems to me that the LACK of God makes an objective morality way more likely than the existence of one. The only problem is that our objective morality, so far as we are concerend, might be completely arbitrary-seeming anyway.
It seems to me that the LACK of God makes an objective morality way more likely than the existence of one. The only problem is that our objective morality, so far as we are concerend, might be completely arbitrary-seeming anyway.
