My views on objective morality

[Mister Agenda]

I was living my life. I can't spend every hour on the internet. Could you not think of something weaker than that to complain about?

Can you think of anything weaker than to critique someone's comments when you haven't been following the thread for context? I know I can't.

You were unfairly hard on Lady For Camus, who should be allowed to press her point on a question of morality when it's raised. CL may have hurt feelings, but this is due to her own cognitive dissonance, which has turned out to be more pervasive than some of us realized - I was a theist myself, but i wasn't that immune to the blacklight of logic! I don't think this has been easy for Lady either, before you dropped in, and i believe she genuinely cares about CL (not a mean bastard as I am all too often, I know) so please step lightly with her if you're going to defend CL.

I see a more detailed response is needed for you.

It's the nature of the internet that I don't actually have to be present at the time to follow the conversation. Everyone's posts are preserved for later perusal. You can't seriously be suggesting that my judgment is flawed because I wasn't caught up in the emotionality of the moment, can you?

There's a difference between pressing your point and going around in circles until the person you're badgering shuts down.

I'm pretty sure her hurt feelings were exactly as she said, due to be ganged up on and relentlessly hammered on questions she had already answered. Which you happily joined in on. I'll take a page from your book and assume that you're defending LfC because of your own cognitive dissonance between thinking you're a decent human being and the evidence that you were behaving like an ass like others who joined in your bullying. I assume you'll let that stand since you seem to think your own guess as to other people's motivations should trump what they've actually said.

I'll call 'em like I see 'em. Always.