My views on objective morality

[Mister Agenda]

Objective does not mean 'absolute'. Two things can be objectively evil, and one of them can objectively be more evil than the other.

I don't think so.  In the case of a rape allowed by God, it must by definition of God be serving a greater good.  It is therefore an act which is allowed with both the intent and the effect of doing good.  It is a good act.

For something to be called objectively evil, it would have to be evil regardless of context.  And I don't think there's any evil, no matter how much we despise it, that cannot be thought of as good given the right (albeit highly unlikely) context.

Yes, it would be a good act. No, that does not mean raping isn't evil.

I'm not familiar with the definition of 'objective' in which context is irrelevant.