(March 12, 2016 at 8:32 am)MysticKnight Wrote:(March 12, 2016 at 8:08 am)bennyboy Wrote: MK, I believe the expression you are looking for is "circular logic." And yes, this does seem to be a case of circular logic.
Double implications exist.
A -> B
B -> A
Therefore A <->B.
It's not circular reasoning. It's that both imply one another.
If there existed a child, there existed a parent.
If there existed a parent, there existed a child.
That's a double implication in the definition of child and parent.
The same can be true of morality because of it's relationship to God as the source.
Okay so...if there exists objective morals, then there exists a god.
If there exists a god, then there exists objective morals.
I don't see how this is supposed to demonstrate that either God or objective morals actually exist...*scratches head*
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.