@OP... Well I figured I'd take a crack at this and you can place whatever label you like Void.. you like that sort of thing, and I'm curious
I consider something justified if the sum of it's feasiblity and utility overcome the probabilities of it's alternatives
I consider something easible if available evidence suggests the probability of that thing being true, is logically consistant and rational
I define utility as indirect measurement of desire plus productivity balanced by conformation bias
I'm fairly tired but I think that sums it up fairly well. Poke away.
I consider something justified if the sum of it's feasiblity and utility overcome the probabilities of it's alternatives
I consider something easible if available evidence suggests the probability of that thing being true, is logically consistant and rational
I define utility as indirect measurement of desire plus productivity balanced by conformation bias
I'm fairly tired but I think that sums it up fairly well. Poke away.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
