(March 12, 2016 at 8:18 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(March 12, 2016 at 8:07 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Yeah, it's pretty clear that Catholic_Lady thinks "objective" means "super duper." She thinks killing and rape are super duper bad, and therefore objectively evil.
No. It is true that objectively immoral acts are very bad, but what it means specifically is that the act is immoral, period. It is not a matter of opinion. If someone says "oh I think rape is good", that person would be incorrect. It's different from your opinion of what the best tasting food is, for example, where there is no correct or incorrect answer, but is merely just a matter of personal opinion and taste.
I don't think so. Wouldn't he just disagree? He dissents from God's opinion/rule/call-it-what-you-will. Given free will his morality merely does not coincide with God's. He is only 'wrong' if he was in fact attempting to predict God's rule. Perhaps he wasn't?
