RE: My views on objective morality
March 12, 2016 at 10:05 pm
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2016 at 10:05 pm by Chas.)
(March 12, 2016 at 8:33 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(March 12, 2016 at 8:24 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: I don't think so. Wouldn't he just disagree? He dissents from God's opinion/rule/call-it-what-you-will. Given free will his morality merely does not coincide with God's. He is only 'wrong' if he was in fact attempting to predict God's rule. Perhaps he wasn't?
Yes, he would disagree, but he would be incorrect. It's like if I disagreed that 2+2=4. I could disagree all day, but I'd still be wrong. What we believe is that the person who thinks rape is good is wrong because we believe rape is objectively immoral. That's what objectively immoral means.
No, that is most certainly not what 'objectively moral' means. You don't appear to understand the meaning of the word 'objectively'.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
