RE: My views on objective morality
March 13, 2016 at 12:54 am
(This post was last modified: March 13, 2016 at 12:55 am by GrandizerII.)
(March 12, 2016 at 8:33 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(March 12, 2016 at 8:24 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: I don't think so. Wouldn't he just disagree? He dissents from God's opinion/rule/call-it-what-you-will. Given free will his morality merely does not coincide with God's. He is only 'wrong' if he was in fact attempting to predict God's rule. Perhaps he wasn't?
Yes, he would disagree, but he would be incorrect. It's like if I disagreed that 2+2=4. I could disagree all day, but I'd still be wrong. What we believe is that the person who thinks rape is good is wrong because we believe rape is objectively immoral. That's what objectively immoral means.
2 + 2 = 4? Says who or what criteria?
By the way, not being sarcastic here. I'm serious.
