RE: The role of probability in solving the Monty Hall problem
March 13, 2016 at 1:11 pm
(This post was last modified: March 13, 2016 at 1:19 pm by robvalue.)
I'm really surprised you're persisting with this, pool. Your hypothesis is that it's 50/50, but the reality of the game shows that this is wrong. So your hypothesis is wrong. If it was 50/50, you'd win about 50% of the time by switching. And you don't.
This kind of observation is a way of estimating probabilities. Say you win 681 times out of 1000 games, it gives you an estimate of 68.1%. You will find it is going to be around 66%, and very rarely will drop as low as 50%. The more games you play, the more accurate the prediction becomes.
Instead of trying to understand why it's wrong, you're screaming at a ball for dropping down, telling it that it should be floating upwards instead.
If you threw a coin 10,000 times and got 6,476 heads, you would conclude that it was probably a weighted coin.
This kind of observation is a way of estimating probabilities. Say you win 681 times out of 1000 games, it gives you an estimate of 68.1%. You will find it is going to be around 66%, and very rarely will drop as low as 50%. The more games you play, the more accurate the prediction becomes.
Instead of trying to understand why it's wrong, you're screaming at a ball for dropping down, telling it that it should be floating upwards instead.
If you threw a coin 10,000 times and got 6,476 heads, you would conclude that it was probably a weighted coin.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum