(March 13, 2016 at 3:54 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: And anyway, in order for any of this to have any practical meaning I'd have to just accept the assertion that objective morality exists in the first place, which I don't, because no one has demonstrated that it does.
We can make a topic just about whether or not objective morality exists or discuss what you truly believe about this issue deep down. But if you accept it's moral fact that it's wrong to torture a being forever and ever....that proves an objective moral.
So it seems you have gone back to denying that premise.