What do you think of this passage?

[KevinM1]

@Kevin, @Boru

Yes, I know. You guys are saying exactly what's on my mind
But the thing is, there has been no corroborated documented historical **claim** from Mr. Unicorn or Mr. Alien, so the risk is practically zero for all practical purposes.

But this particular god who claims to be the creator of the universe has been pretty consistent in his threats through many claims over different historical periods ... hence the risk is more practical and real, catch my drift?

That's still utterly illogical.  That god's threats are static.  They've remained unchanged for thousands of years.  There's also nothing to verify that this god is actually behind those threats, or that, again, this god actually exists.

What does it matter that the same message has been repeated over and over?  Repetition doesn't lend reality to fiction.

Again: provide evidence.  If you have none for your god, that means you also have none for your hell.