RE: What do you think of this passage?
March 14, 2016 at 7:31 pm
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2016 at 7:34 pm by truth_seeker.)
(March 14, 2016 at 7:23 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Quote:But the thing is, there has been no corroborated documented historical **claim** from Mr. Unicorn or Mr. Alien, so the risk is practically zero for all practical purposes.
And there's a 'corroborated documented historical claim' from the God of Abraham?
Boru
There appears to be a group of historical documents that different groups of people have **claimed** to be from this god.
Hence my increased ballpark risk evaluation for this god (say, at 20%? .. not more than 50) compared to the risk from the Unicorn (±0.1%?)
(March 14, 2016 at 7:30 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Actually the chance is around 1 in at least a million.
There have been millions of deities invented by humans. What makes the Muslim deity any more realistic than any of the others.
Totally agree ... there has been tons of deities claiming to be gods ...
but I haven't seen claims of fierce warnings from other deities .. so **if** it turned out to be true, I'm screwed
again .. I'm not saying belief is necessarily right ... am just evaluating the risks involved