The Quest for the Historical Paul

[Minimalist]

http://www.radikalkritik.de/nashville.htm

The name ‘Hollandse Radicalen’, Dutch Radicals, has been given to a group of Dutch New Testament scholars at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century. In spite of their many different opinions, for example about the historicity of Jesus, the Dutch Radicals agreed that none of the so-called Pauline epistles were authentic. They argued that these epistles were written in the second century.[1] Even the famous ‘Tübingen school’ did not include the four main epistles in their critical interpretation of the letters of Paul: Romans, 1-2 Corinthians and Galatians. In this regard the ideas of the Dutch Radicals were rather extreme. The most well-known Radicals[2] are A.D. Loman[3], W.C. van Manen[4] and G.A. van den Bergh van Eysinga.[5] Van Manen is the most influential representative of the Dutch Radicals.

Generally I could give a shit about the 'doctrinal' paul.  I'm more interested in the 'historical' version of this phony but there are scholars who annoy the piss out of fundies.