(March 16, 2016 at 4:29 am)robvalue Wrote: Yup.
And we've explained how "god's opinion" is subjective anyway.
I perfectly respect someone saying they think rape is always wrong. (Although I can construct situations where I would personally question the judgement.) But I can't accept someone saying their way of assessing morality is objectively correct, unless they give a very strong argument why this is the case. Or how that is even coherent. If it's simply a matter of opinion, then that's the definition of subjective.
I've had the same problem with Roadrunner on another thread. I just don't think people are using the word "objective" properly.
They are using the word "objective" incorrectly but it's not by accident. They are using the word incorrectly because they have to, they are stuck working backwards from their conclusion that god exists and he's the source of morality.
