(March 16, 2016 at 11:49 am)bennyboy Wrote:(March 16, 2016 at 11:38 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Yes, but you've already established the reasonableness of the assumption when studying human subjects. Whether that assumption would be reasonable in the case of robots is a separate case which does not inform the original case. You're simply raising an impotent objection as if it were potent.
I don't think I've established that at all. Care to quote?
(March 16, 2016 at 12:48 am)bennyboy Wrote: You haven't explained how you have ascertained that the physical structure sitting in your lab (i.e. the person) actually does experience qualia. . . . Now, in the case of people, this is a very easy assumption to make.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)