I will see how the "reasonablefaith.org" works out but for now it seems to me to be the ONE question that should put an end to all others.
Only with undeniable proof that stacks up with physical evidence can the god hypothesis be made fact.
It is the same with aliens. Yes the math says there should be life out there but so far we have nothing but drakes equation.
I for one feel the math is good but in the end no one has a specimen in hand of such an E.T.
I also know also that our understanding of the universe is limited. With that in mind I am willing to change my views with the facts presented.
The usual argument I get is "God wont go about proving himself because A). he does not feel the need to. B). By doing so God would take away our free choice to chose him or not. C) This life is a only a test to see if you will believe with 0 evidence in him so that you can earn heaven and avoid hell.
All of which to the scientific and military mind amounts to excuses for lack of evidence.
As for the evidence against God, Rob had really good points and the only one i can add is that I have yet to see a divine action come from a human that could not have been done by a non-believer. Even that is not original by me. That point is brought up by Christipher Hitchens. So far no one has been able to counter it.
I don't see any one religious set of people being better (moral actions) as a whole due to some divine force.
Only with undeniable proof that stacks up with physical evidence can the god hypothesis be made fact.
It is the same with aliens. Yes the math says there should be life out there but so far we have nothing but drakes equation.
I for one feel the math is good but in the end no one has a specimen in hand of such an E.T.
I also know also that our understanding of the universe is limited. With that in mind I am willing to change my views with the facts presented.
The usual argument I get is "God wont go about proving himself because A). he does not feel the need to. B). By doing so God would take away our free choice to chose him or not. C) This life is a only a test to see if you will believe with 0 evidence in him so that you can earn heaven and avoid hell.
All of which to the scientific and military mind amounts to excuses for lack of evidence.
As for the evidence against God, Rob had really good points and the only one i can add is that I have yet to see a divine action come from a human that could not have been done by a non-believer. Even that is not original by me. That point is brought up by Christipher Hitchens. So far no one has been able to counter it.
I don't see any one religious set of people being better (moral actions) as a whole due to some divine force.
