I can make a very rational argument against the existence of the soul because I'm like genius or something.
1.) Sight happens because the eye captures light, which is then interpreted as sight by the brain. Ditto with ears and soundwaves.
2.) If you have no eye and no ear and no brain, you can neither "see" nor "hear."
3.) Therefore, either the soul is an "immaterial" item (whatever that means) and it will experience an eternity of total sensory deprivation, or it will have sensory experience because it's a material item with its own means of interpreting light and sound waves and so on.
As far as I know, no religion claims that the soul will experience an eternity of sensory deprivation, so we must conclude that the soul is a material thing.
So why haven't we found it, religious people?
1.) Sight happens because the eye captures light, which is then interpreted as sight by the brain. Ditto with ears and soundwaves.
2.) If you have no eye and no ear and no brain, you can neither "see" nor "hear."
3.) Therefore, either the soul is an "immaterial" item (whatever that means) and it will experience an eternity of total sensory deprivation, or it will have sensory experience because it's a material item with its own means of interpreting light and sound waves and so on.
As far as I know, no religion claims that the soul will experience an eternity of sensory deprivation, so we must conclude that the soul is a material thing.
So why haven't we found it, religious people?
You're not an ugly person; you're a beautiful monkey.