Is Lack of Belief the Best You Can Do?
March 25, 2016 at 9:32 am
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2016 at 10:05 am by LadyForCamus.
Edit Reason: Syntax
)
(March 25, 2016 at 12:13 am)ChadWooters Wrote: Ms. Camus, the concepts around the "God of the Philosophers" are extremely well defined, as early as Plotinus, and very coherent. There simply is no support for the notion that the God of Classical Monotheism is ill-defined. Granted, many believers are a bit fuzzy on the specifics so I can see how it may appear to you.
Well if that is the case, then why, for crying out loud, don't you streamline your discussions/arguments to that end rather than all the existential, "true meaning of reality" stuff? It just seems like it would be more productive, especially if your goal is to persuade atheists into considering the God of Christianity.
I just don't see how badgering empiricists into admitting that there may be some aspects of the universe beyond our comprehension accomplishes anything. Frankly, it's irritating when executed in such a condescending tone.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
