(March 25, 2016 at 9:28 am)Aractus Wrote:(March 24, 2016 at 5:04 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
As someone who is almost qualified as a health professional, let me say that's total BS. If you want to have half a glass of wine while pregnant no one can show it's harmful. And things need to be put into perspective in any case. Even if the procedure is harmful while pregnant - in the first 2 weeks it's not going to do diddaly squat. And by that I mean anything that harmful will just abort the zygote, not cause ongoing developmental harm to it.
I was hearing on the radio recently about a lady that was denied a coffee because she was (obviously) pregnant. And to be honest at her stage of pregnancy caffeine can be harmful to the child, that's not theory it's a fact. There's no known safe level. But that said, health advice allows women to have two coffees a day. So I do disagree with refusing her a coffee, but if the barrister knows that caffeine is harmful to pregnancy I don't disagree with his choice either. I also kind of respect the other point of view and I would have preferred to have heard the lady say something like "health advice is I can have two coffees so it should be fine" which she didn't say (on the radio). When people don't know what's advised then they're in a position where they're not able to defend themselves the way they should be.
Anyway, I'm very sorry to hear about that situation sounds like you are certainly in the right.
But you are not qualified as a lawyer. That doctor was practicing "defensive medicine" as in, "if I do it and something goes wrong I get sued and my malpractice insurance rates go up." The US does not have enough doctors but we have way too many fucking lawyers.