(March 26, 2016 at 9:23 am)MysticKnight Wrote:(March 26, 2016 at 8:26 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Ok, so you believe that God is the source of the rules, meaning that divine command determines right and wrong and there is no need for morality. That would be the first scenario I described, and it still isn't objective morality.
If you are arguing for Divine Command Theory, you are not arguing for objective morality.
It's not the case that he simply commands, rather he creates through the truth of his standards (divine names) which are based on his essence. He doesn't decide morality or create it from nothing. Neither does it exist separately from him or independent of him, but rather he is the standard.
Euthyphro dilemma. Yup, I read bitches! [emoji12]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
