Proving God in 20 statements

[Mudhammam]

Nestor: I'm not really sure what you're asking me. I agree there are axiomatic assumptions that cannot be tested. Hopefully, everyone agrees on these when the debate begins, and they should be as few as possible.

OK... So if God is not a physical being, and one believes that's its existence can be demonstrated through syllogism, starting only with the axiomatic assumptions that you are willing to grant, what's the problem? I mean, isn't it enough that one argues for the validity and consistency of their worldview when both sides have admitted that not every true proposition can be expected to have the support of evidence?