RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 5, 2016 at 2:56 pm
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2016 at 2:59 pm by Mister Agenda.)
smfortune Wrote:Rhythm Wrote:What problem would that be? I don't mind saying "I don't know", problem solved.Oh, a causation problem. Who caused the causer?
A first cause doesn't require a causer, by definition. This by the way, is a legitimate use of appeal to definition, unlike your 'the first cause is God' assertion disguised as a definition. And using the term 'who' is an unwarranted assumption. And all that is granting the invalid (and question begging) premise that everything requires a cause with one exception. But it's nice to see that you can recognize the problem when the word 'God' is removed.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.