If there is an objective morality it wouldn't need to be explained so as to enlighten humans to what they should go about their day thinking is morally correct, they would just know it.
In other words, if there was an objective morality we wouldn't need you here to explain to us what it is.
In other words, if there was an objective morality we wouldn't need you here to explain to us what it is.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.