What would you consider to be evidence for God?

[robvalue]

I was a bit rude and I apologise. Everything you wrote, in my opinion, was entirely a red herring and of no consequence to any of my points. But that's just for your information and those following at home. I really see no point continuing. You probably think it was all relevant, so again, not much point.

I could state what I think the difference between me and you is when it comes to assumptions, but I don't think that would be productive either. Yes, I do believe I've totally dismantled Aquinas, both in my video and before by dissecting all the logical fallacies. Obviously you don't agree. I'll leave it up to the reader as to who has made the better case. I'm not in the business of announcing myself a winner. I'm always open to being convinced, but sadly you haven't convinced me of anything.

On that note, I shall wave our debates goodbye.