(April 13, 2016 at 11:29 pm)dyresand Wrote:(April 13, 2016 at 8:24 pm)Cato Wrote: The judge got this right. Cavanaugh didn't argue for the veracity of the religion or how not wearing a pirate costume burdened his practice of Pastafarianism. Should be also be allowed some grog and a pet parrot?
Granting Patafarianism religious status does Pastafarianism a disservice. It is clearly a parody of religion. Granting it religious status just puts it on the shelf with all the other ridiculous shit it was created to expose.
I agree with that as well it is just a mockery to piss of theists we really don't want people believing in a flying spaghetti monster we just
use that to mock theists we don't believe in it or do we?
There is as much evidence for the FSM (PBHNA) as there is for jesus or allah.



