RE: Do humans have souls?
March 25, 2009 at 5:05 pm
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2009 at 5:08 pm by Kyuuketsuki.)
(March 25, 2009 at 1:32 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Whether the soul is physical or non-physical, it shouldn't matter. There still should be evidence.
Not in Frodoverse
Kyu
(March 25, 2009 at 2:21 pm)Rockthatpiano06 Wrote: My biggest problem with humans having or not having souls (and I apologize if I missed something in the thread that talks about this because I didn't read it all) is that if humans have souls, then surely everything living must? I mean, humans can't be the only ones. If everything has a soul, does that include things like trees, bacteria, ect? That's why I don't really believe humans have a literal soul. I think our personalities and lives create a figurative soul, but not in a physical sense if you know what I mean.
Ah, but we speshul see, we betta van all ver ress yeah?
hock:Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
