(April 15, 2016 at 5:55 pm)FebruaryOfReason Wrote:(April 15, 2016 at 9:30 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Demonstrate God, Chad. Come on. Demonstrate ...
Do it Chad. Do it.
Get in the ring
Get in the ring
Get in the ring
Get in the ring
Get in the ring
Get in the ring
And in this corner, weighing in at 850 thousand miles of published works, Science and Empiricism....
Get in the ring
Get in the ring
Get in the ring
GET IN THE RING
GET IN THE RING
GET IN THE RING
GET IN THE RING
GET IN THE RING
GET IN THE RING
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tfyLbin9gs
What you gonna take refuge in nomenclature?
Once we get anywhere near those dirty, nasty specifics - urgh!, the concrete - anything that we can actually check - you're the one that bails.
Why that sequence of colours in the rainbow, always appearing in the same climatic conditions, Chad? God?
Why do diamonds glint at that specific angle to the light, Chad? God?
Why do fish have pointy heads, Chad? Was it God?
Why do some stars look different from others, Chad? God's will?
Why polymers, Chad? A god who tells his people not to wear mixed fabrics?
Why does radio work, Chad? Was it God, waiting for us to find out about it all along?
Why the jet stream, Chad? God?
Why are some steels harder than others, Chad? God makes them hard?
Where did the Flood come from, Chad? God?
Why infection, Chad? Was it god?
Why coagulation, Chad? God?
Differentiation between the species? God?
Planets almost like our own - god?
Gas giants dying through gravity - no mention of it in your ancient texts.
No neutrinos, no blood circulation, no lymphatic system.
No calcium pathways, no axons.
Where is your method for answering these questions definitively, Chad? I'm not talking about a theory that sounds good. How can you show you're right? Where is your method for finding out new things?
Don't reply through this forum - after all, the technology you're using was only made possible through dirty, nasty, unclean, hard checking of theories, finding out whether they were actually right or not, and changing them if they were wrong.
Just reply to us all through prayer - I'm sure you'll manage to transmit all the specifics to us exactly, and it's much cleaner.
There are only so many syllables in all those old books of assertions, Chad. Not an inexhaustible supply....
This is officially THE BEST POST (IMO) that I've ever read here at AF. Thank you. THANK YOU. :: worship ::
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
