We don't know whether anything is necessary in the sense that it would be an impossibility for it not to exist. I don't think we have any way of telling whether some thing's existence is necessary. Therefore postulating some thing's existence as necessary is pure assumption. This obviously has applications in the cosmological arguments. Any that conclude that there is a necessarily existing being called God are just assuming their conclusion. There is no convincing way to demonstrate that God is necessary. It's just circular reasoning.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)