(April 16, 2016 at 12:28 pm)FebruaryOfReason Wrote:(April 16, 2016 at 11:35 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I think that you are either misunderstanding or misrepresenting what Chad is trying to say. In any case however, why are you using philosophy here, rather than science to make your point?
I was asking him to prove something, anything, rather than just asserting something. Why is he so reluctant to tell us something about God that we can check? Just one thing?
Like Brian says, why not just cut to the chase?
Get in the lab. Why is the lab not an appropriate intellectual tool to investigate religion?
It depends on what the claim is. His point, is that the lab is not the correct category to answer all questions. There is truth outside of science. Science assumes things that it cannot demonstrate. Also science doesn't prove anything, that is for math and logic
