(April 16, 2016 at 12:52 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(April 16, 2016 at 12:28 pm)FebruaryOfReason Wrote: I was asking him to prove something, anything, rather than just asserting something. Why is he so reluctant to tell us something about God that we can check? Just one thing?
Like Brian says, why not just cut to the chase?
Get in the lab. Why is the lab not an appropriate intellectual tool to investigate religion?
It depends on what the claim is. His point, is that the lab is not the correct category to answer all questions. There is truth outside of science. Science assumes things that it cannot demonstrate. Also science doesn't prove anything, that is for math and logic
You are quite right. Science is a tool for disproving things.
That's why a lot of people don't like to expose their assertions to it.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.